No. 98-1972

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER TERM, 1999

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Re: JAMES CONSTANT,

Debtor,

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JAMES CONSTANT

Petitioner,

V.

ADVANCED MICRO-DEVICES, INC.

DAVID L. RAY, Trustee;

SALTZBURG, RAY & BERGMAN;

Respondents.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

TO THEUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

James Constant

Pro-per Petitioner

i

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

Has the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided an important question of patent law in an abbreviated manner which makes it impossible for the petitioner to tell why his appeal was denied and why he should not petition this Court?

FULL BOOK AVAILABLE AT

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/356236

https://www.smashwords.com/books/byseries/6524