STOP JUDICIAL ABUSE

The treatment of individual inventors shows how federal courts, federal judges and the Supreme Court operate as arbitrary decision makers of a judicial system which institutionalizes judicial abuse. This is the story of one inventor who went to court claiming that 17 global corporations infringed his patents but found himself ensnared in the web of a corrupt judicial system for 15 years and emerged bankrupted. Wake up America, the whole world now sees your corrupt justice system. Americans, your mortal threat is domestic not foreign. The reader of these pages and links will find the names and specific acts of federal judicial abusers who operate with impunity under color of law.

The Federal Judiciary and Individual Inventors

• Independent Inventors http://www.coolissues.com
• Federal Courts Crush Inventors. http://inventors.coolissues.com/fcourts.htm
• How Federal Courts Crush Inventors and Protect Global Corporate Interests.
• http://inventors.coolissues.com/fcourts_1.htm
• Federal Circuit Methodology for Deciding Patent Cases Brought by Individual Inventor. http://inventors.coolissues.com/fcourts_11.htm
• The Eunich Patent Office. http://inventors.coolissues.com/eunpto.htm
• Cert Denied http://supremecourt.coolissues.com/certden.htm
• U.S. Supreme Court Decision Bush v. Gore http://supremecourt.coolissues.com/bushvgore.htm
• Non-Existent Discipline of Federal Judges. http://inventors.coolissues.com/djudges
• Judges Bios http://air.fjc.gov/history/judges_frm.html
• Suing Judges - Actual Case No. 93-1413
• Suing Judges - Judicial Immunity http://www.perkel.com/pbl/immune.htm

Indictment -The following courts and federal judges

• Claim absolute immunity for acts taken without jurisdiction No. 89-425, No. 93-1413
• Use unqualified lawyers as mythical experts to invalidate patents and ignore real world class NATO and US experts who have failed to anticipate or suggest inventions covered by patents. No. 89-425, No. 01-438
• Label decisions NOT FOR PUBLICATION to avoid scrutiny No. 93-1413, No. 93-1518, No. 94-782, No. 01-438
• 9th Circuit decides federal patent cases in violation of its jurisdiction which bars its review of patent cases and labels its decisions NOT FOR PUBLICATION No. 94-782, No. 96-1177 , No. 96-1178, No. 99-396
• 9th Circuit decides federal patent cases under California state laws in violation of federal patent laws and labels its decisions NOT FOR PUBLICATION No. 94-782, No. 96-1177 , No. 96-1178, No. 99-396
• 9th Circuit bars pro se inventor's appeals in violation of inventor's right to petition government unless inventor hires an attorney No. 94-1257, No. 96-1177 , No. 96-1178, No. 98-1151, No. 99-396, No. 98-1972
• Use Summary judgment to Invalidate Patents http://inventors.coolissues.com/djudges
• Use State Law to Nullify Federal Rights http://lawlibrary.ucdavis.edu/LAWLIB/Nov97/0164.html
• Use State Laws to Take Federal Patents No. 93-1518 , No. 94-782.
• Disregard Lack of Jurisdiction fed-judges, No. 89-425, No. 93-1413, No. 93-1518, No. 94-782, No. 94-1257, No. 96-1177, No. 96-1178, No. 99-396
• Ignore Constitution http://cwfa.org/library/misc/1997-11-2b-judges.shtml
• Disobey the Law
• http://www.apbnews.com/media/mediawatch/scharkey/2000/07/05/sch
• Trump Patent Office Reexamination Procedure under 35 USWC 302. No. 89-425, No. 88-308
• Apply arbitrary Sanctions under FRCP 11 and FRAP 38. No. 89-425, No. 93-1518
• Use unqualified Special Master No. 89-425
• Use arbitrary Summary Judgement and Res Judicata involving different claims and issues No. 89-425
• Violate Constitutional and Civil Rights. No. 89-425, No. 93-1413
• Decide Defenses Without Hearing Claims in violation of FRCP 54(b), 28 USC 1338, 28 USC 1331, 28 USC 1343, 28 USC 1334, 28 USC 157(b)(2). No. 93-1413, No. 93-1518
• Apply creditor's judgements against patents in violation of 28 USC 1962, No. 93-1518
• Assign patents under California State Laws in violation of 35 USC 261 and 28 USC 1962. No. 93-1518 , No. 94-782
• Assume jurisdiction in violation of FRCP 12(h)(3). No. 94-782
• Arbitrarily enter prefiling orders without jurisdiction. No. 94-1257
• Coerce pro-se litigant into having an attorney No. 94-1257, No. 96-1178
• Use local rules and state laws to take patent rights. No. 96-1177
• Cherry pick issues and ignore substantial issues No. 96-1177
• Decide issues in conflict with California State laws. No. 98-1151
• Decide issues in abbreviated manner which cannot be understood and are unsuitable for appeal. No. 98-1972
• Fail to litigate and actually determine jurisdiction. No. 99-396
• Decide cases under wrong standard FRCP 52(a) in violation of correct standard 5 USC 706.No. 01-438

Indictment - The Supreme Court

• Denies certiorari and leaves important Patent Questions Unanswered in violation of equal treatment (all cases)
• WC SCT Amicus Briefs http://ipccreators.org/SC/IPCSupremeCourtOverview.htm
• Has a bias against inventors
• http://ipccreators.org/Operation_Brandeis/theis_supreme_court
• Inventors terrorized by courts http://ipccreators.org/SC/Kearns/kearns_amicus.htm

Actual Cases Cited

No. 88-308 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . . . . United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Before DAVIS, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and SMITH, Circuit Judge U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge Wilson

No. 89-425 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . . . United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Before SMITH, NIES,and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge Manuel Real

No. 93-1413 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . . . United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before SCHROEDER, NELSON, and THOMPSON Circuit Judges U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge Manuel Real

No. 93-1518 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before SCHROEDER, NELSON, and THOMPSON Circuit Judges U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge Manuel Real

No. 94-782 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . . United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before HALL, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ Circuit Judges U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge A. Wallace Tashima

No. 94-1257 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges

No. 96-1177 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before BEEZER, KOZINSKY, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges

No. 96-1178 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges

No. 98-1151 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before NELSON, KLEINFELD, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge Ronald S. W. Lew

No. 99-396 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before O'SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge Ronald S. W. Lew

No. 98-1972 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Before SNEAD, KOZINSKY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Judge Manuel Real

No. 01-438 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Before MAYER, Chief Judge, LINN and DYK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. United States Patent and Trademark Office

Similar Cases:

Ten Federal Judges who Must be Impeached for Abuse of Power http://home.earthlink.net/~dlaw70/top10.htm

Federal Judges Misconduct http://www.clr.org/fed-judges.html