TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS i
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii
I. STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1
II. WHY THE COURT SHOULD GRANT THE PETITION 1
III. LEGAL ARGUMENTS 2
Section 473(d) Argument 2
Section 663 Argument 4
EXHIBIT 1 (MOTION TO VOID JUDGMENT)
EXHIBIT 2 (APPEAL COURT'S DECISION)
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF APPEAL COURT'S DECISION
I. STATEMENT OF ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW
1. When presented with a Motion to Void a Judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(d), as in EXHIBIT 1, does a court have discretion to remain silent and avoid addressing its fundamental jurisdiction in writing?
2. Does the evidence presented in EXHIBIT 1 show that the judgment in this case is void for precluding petitioner from participating in his case at trial?
3. When silent on a first motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(d), does a court have discretionary powers to certify its decision on a second motion pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 663, as an unpublished opinion pursuant to California Rules of Court rule 8.1115?
4. Shall this court determine the motion presented in EXHIBIT 1 sua sponte without further delay?
Book available at https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/343238